A Sarma vs E Mathew Comparison

A Sarma is a quick runner, while E Mathew is more of a a balanced player.

AS

A Sarma

27.4
10% batting confidence (Low)
0% bowling confidence (Low)
Open Player Profile
EM

E Mathew

27.4
16% batting confidence (Low)
23% bowling confidence (Low)

🏆 Equal leads

Equal has a higher CricRating (27.4 vs 27.4), indicating stronger overall performance.

Rankings are adjusted using data confidence to ensure fairness. Players with more match data are rated more reliably.
Batting confidence: 10% vs 16% | Bowling confidence: 0% vs 23%

Head-to-Head Stats

1
Power
3
22
Aggression
12.7
30.3
Consistency
4.1
81.3
Running
69.4
2.5
Shot Placement
2.8
34.4
Boundary %
36.9
0
Wicket Power
7.6
0
Control
22.1
0
Strike Threat
55.1
0
Pressure
35.6
0
Efficiency
65.3
0
Durability
0

Key Differences

  • A Sarma leads in Consistency(30.3 vs 4.1)
  • A Sarma leads in Running(81.3 vs 69.4)
  • A Sarma leads in Aggression(22 vs 12.7)

Player Comparison FAQs

Who is better, A Sarma or E Mathew?

Equal has a higher overall rating (27.4 vs 27.4) compared to A Sarma, based on combined batting and bowling performance.

Who is better in Consistency, A Sarma or E Mathew?

A Sarma performs better in Consistency with a score of 30.3 compared to E Mathew's 4.1.

Who is better in Running, A Sarma or E Mathew?

A Sarma performs better in Running with a score of 81.3 compared to E Mathew's 69.4.

Who is better in Aggression, A Sarma or E Mathew?

A Sarma performs better in Aggression with a score of 22 compared to E Mathew's 12.7.

Login to CricRating

Use [email protected] email and Alex1234 as password to access the demo account.