AS Withanage vs C Forshaw Comparison

AS Withanage and C Forshaw have similar playing styles, both being a balanced player.

AW

AS Withanage

27.8
11% batting confidence (Low)
4% bowling confidence (Low)
Open Player Profile
CF

C Forshaw

27.8
2% batting confidence (Low)
15% bowling confidence (Low)

🏆 Equal leads

Equal has a higher CricRating (27.8 vs 27.8), indicating stronger overall performance.

Rankings are adjusted using data confidence to ensure fairness. Players with more match data are rated more reliably.
Batting confidence: 11% vs 2% | Bowling confidence: 4% vs 15%

Head-to-Head Stats

0
Power
0.5
13.4
Aggression
0.8
32
Consistency
1
37
Running
68.1
6
Shot Placement
0
61.5
Boundary %
28.6
1.2
Wicket Power
8
29
Control
17
50
Strike Threat
72.3
43.7
Pressure
33.6
57.1
Efficiency
100
0
Durability
0

Key Differences

  • C Forshaw leads in Efficiency(100 vs 57.1)
  • AS Withanage leads in Boundary %(61.5 vs 28.6)
  • C Forshaw leads in Running(68.1 vs 37)
  • AS Withanage leads in Consistency(32 vs 1)

Player Comparison FAQs

Who is better, AS Withanage or C Forshaw?

Equal has a higher overall rating (27.8 vs 27.8) compared to AS Withanage, based on combined batting and bowling performance.

Who is better in Efficiency, AS Withanage or C Forshaw?

C Forshaw performs better in Efficiency with a score of 100 compared to AS Withanage's 57.1.

Who is better in Boundary %, AS Withanage or C Forshaw?

AS Withanage performs better in Boundary % with a score of 61.5 compared to C Forshaw's 28.6.

Who is better in Running, AS Withanage or C Forshaw?

C Forshaw performs better in Running with a score of 68.1 compared to AS Withanage's 37.

Who is better in Consistency, AS Withanage or C Forshaw?

AS Withanage performs better in Consistency with a score of 32 compared to C Forshaw's 1.

Login to CricRating

Use [email protected] email and Alex1234 as password to access the demo account.