Hasan Mahmud vs Jobayer Hossen Comparison

Hasan Mahmud and Jobayer Hossen have similar playing styles, both being a balanced player.

HM

Hasan Mahmud

32.8
7% batting confidence (Low)
100% bowling confidence (High)
Open Player Profile
JH

Jobayer Hossen

32.9
2% batting confidence (Low)
6% bowling confidence (Low)

🏆 Jobayer Hossen leads

Jobayer Hossen has a higher CricRating (32.8 vs 32.9), indicating stronger overall performance.

Rankings are adjusted using data confidence to ensure fairness. Players with more match data are rated more reliably.
Batting confidence: 7% vs 2% | Bowling confidence: 100% vs 6%

Head-to-Head Stats

1.5
Power
0
0
Aggression
0
2.9
Consistency
0
48.3
Running
41.6
1
Shot Placement
0.5
42.5
Boundary %
47.1
39.2
Wicket Power
3.6
25
Control
30
53.3
Strike Threat
76.7
38.3
Pressure
46.6
62.1
Efficiency
100
38.1
Durability
0

Key Differences

  • Hasan Mahmud leads in Durability(38.1 vs 0)
  • Jobayer Hossen leads in Efficiency(100 vs 62.1)
  • Hasan Mahmud leads in Wicket Power(39.2 vs 3.6)
  • Jobayer Hossen leads in Strike Threat(76.7 vs 53.3)

Player Comparison FAQs

Who is better, Hasan Mahmud or Jobayer Hossen?

Jobayer Hossen has a higher overall rating (32.9 vs 32.8) compared to Hasan Mahmud, based on combined batting and bowling performance.

Who is better in Durability, Hasan Mahmud or Jobayer Hossen?

Hasan Mahmud performs better in Durability with a score of 38.1 compared to Jobayer Hossen's 0.

Who is better in Efficiency, Hasan Mahmud or Jobayer Hossen?

Jobayer Hossen performs better in Efficiency with a score of 100 compared to Hasan Mahmud's 62.1.

Who is better in Wicket Power, Hasan Mahmud or Jobayer Hossen?

Hasan Mahmud performs better in Wicket Power with a score of 39.2 compared to Jobayer Hossen's 3.6.

Who is better in Strike Threat, Hasan Mahmud or Jobayer Hossen?

Jobayer Hossen performs better in Strike Threat with a score of 76.7 compared to Hasan Mahmud's 53.3.

Login to CricRating

Use [email protected] email and Alex1234 as password to access the demo account.