SS Connell vs US Hathinjar Comparison

SS Connell and US Hathinjar have similar playing styles, both being a balanced player.

SC

SS Connell

32.8
5% batting confidence (Low)
79% bowling confidence (High)
Open Player Profile
UH

US Hathinjar

32.8
28% batting confidence (Low)
2% bowling confidence (Low)

🏆 Equal leads

Equal has a higher CricRating (32.8 vs 32.8), indicating stronger overall performance.

Rankings are adjusted using data confidence to ensure fairness. Players with more match data are rated more reliably.
Batting confidence: 5% vs 28% | Bowling confidence: 79% vs 2%

Head-to-Head Stats

1
Power
12
0
Aggression
34
0
Consistency
17.8
53.1
Running
42.3
0.5
Shot Placement
10.3
37.7
Boundary %
65.3
19.6
Wicket Power
1.2
35.7
Control
22
39.9
Strike Threat
75
54.7
Pressure
40.2
45.1
Efficiency
100
19.4
Durability
0

Key Differences

  • US Hathinjar leads in Efficiency(100 vs 45.1)
  • US Hathinjar leads in Strike Threat(75 vs 39.9)
  • US Hathinjar leads in Aggression(34 vs 0)
  • US Hathinjar leads in Boundary %(65.3 vs 37.7)

Player Comparison FAQs

Who is better, SS Connell or US Hathinjar?

Equal has a higher overall rating (32.8 vs 32.8) compared to SS Connell, based on combined batting and bowling performance.

Who is better in Efficiency, SS Connell or US Hathinjar?

US Hathinjar performs better in Efficiency with a score of 100 compared to SS Connell's 45.1.

Who is better in Strike Threat, SS Connell or US Hathinjar?

US Hathinjar performs better in Strike Threat with a score of 75 compared to SS Connell's 39.9.

Who is better in Aggression, SS Connell or US Hathinjar?

US Hathinjar performs better in Aggression with a score of 34 compared to SS Connell's 0.

Who is better in Boundary %, SS Connell or US Hathinjar?

US Hathinjar performs better in Boundary % with a score of 65.3 compared to SS Connell's 37.7.

Login to CricRating

Use [email protected] email and Alex1234 as password to access the demo account.